[ipv6-wg] Last call on the replacement of ripe-501 "Requirements for IPv6 in ICT equipment"
Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Fri Oct 21 22:51:04 CEST 2011
On 10/21/11 10:01 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > Tassos, > >> I noticed [I-D.ymbk-aplusp] on the list, which recently became RFC >> 6346. Besides updating the list, do you find it appropriate to >> include RFCs with experimental status? > > I think we should apply reasonable judgement. > > with regards to A+P, that's an architecture document. I don't > understand how an implementation could support that. there are a > number of A+P-ish solutions being worked on in the softwire wg. 4rd, > dIVI and ds-lite + A+P. plus a general stateless address mapping > document and DHCP option. these are the A+P solutions, but way too > early to include any of this work. I do not think 6346 belongs in > RIPE-501. hey, it's optional and covers everything you just said. Cool, is it? :) > >> Also 3484bis is still in draft. > > 3484bis fixes some real problems. hopefully it will be RFC before 501 > is out. early november? > >> If we include drafts, then 6204 should also be changed to 6204bis. >> Although i would prefer to have the final RFCs in. > > I have suggested to just shelf 6204bis until we have something to put > in it. 501 already has the references to 6rd and ds-lite that 6204bis > adds. so not needed. +1 /jan
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]