[ipv6-wg] Re: not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Seitz
chris at in-berlin.de
Tue Jul 26 09:01:31 CEST 2011
Hi Gert, On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Gert Doering wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:37:05AM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >>> 5) ? >> >> Adapt uRPF so that it does't filter ICMP error messages. Whether this >> is useful depends on how much ICMP error messages with unreachable >> source addresses we expect to see? When people/organizations start to >> use ULA addresses it might be more than we see now. > > Indeed this sounds like a good "option #5". > > Christian, can your gear do IPv6-uRPF-with-permit-ACLs in Hardware? > > (My gear can only do IPv6-uRPF in software, no matter what options I > use, so we currently filter by ACL) both Juniper MX960 and Cisco CRS-1 are able to do IPv6 uRPF incl. permit ACL (Cisco) and fail-filter (Juniper) in hardware so we would like to use it as for IPv4. Regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]