[ipv6-wg] not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Jul 25 17:46:13 CEST 2011
Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:24:10PM +0200, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: > 5) easier said than done as uRPF checks are done solely at layer-3 and > nobody wants to send rejected packets to the route processor, don't we? Well, that completely depends on the hardware capabilities. Maybe some vendors can do IPv6 uRPF-checks plus uRPF-exception-ACLs in hardware now... Gert Doering -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 306 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20110725/00bf1e57/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: not announcing IXP IPv6 peering lan prefixes in global BGP table possibly breaks PMTUD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]