[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Jul 25 01:30:38 CEST 2011
On 7/25/11 1:21 AM, Sander Steffann wrote: > Hi, > >>> I would put this in 'mandatory': >>> >>> - If the IS-IS routing protocol is requested the equipment MUST >>> support "M-ISIS: Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate >>> System to Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)" [RFC 5120] >> >> ok, I see you already updated the draft on Gdocs. > > I didn't put this change in yet though :) ah, ok, my mistake. Done, changed. > >> One question, should we use "MUST" with capital letters or we use >> normal "must" in this "if" sentences? > > > We are not writing an RFC so I think we should use lowercase. corrected. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]