[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jul 25 01:21:12 CEST 2011
Hi, >> I would put this in 'mandatory': >> >> - If the IS-IS routing protocol is requested the equipment MUST >> support "M-ISIS: Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System >> to Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)" [RFC 5120] > > ok, I see you already updated the draft on Gdocs. I didn't put this change in yet though :) > One question, should we use "MUST" with capital letters or we use normal "must" in this "if" sentences? We are not writing an RFC so I think we should use lowercase. Met vriendelijke groet, Sander Steffann
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]