[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Jan 26 11:45:26 CET 2011
On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote: >> <> >> As an example, one would create <provider-tla>::/36 with an assignment >> size of /56. A simple MRTG graph over time showing the actual number > of >> assignments or customers can then be generated from the OSS/BSS system >> or maybe even directly from the DHCPv6 servers involved. This would > then >> satisfy the need to verify the addresses are used efficiently enough > and >> the LIR meets the HD ratio required. It does so in a way to which most >> LIRs are already familiar and without the need to disclose to any >> specific information on individual End Users or the resource they > hold. >> <> >> >> GV> Not sure why this is here in the intro... it's a valid and usefull >> anticipation, but I would place it somewhere else in the document as a >> motivation example. > > Forgive me for asking, are you commenting on the policy proposal itself > or on one of the draft documents which will be the result of this ? > > GV> I was just surprised to see an example in the intro section... it is > not that I disagree with it, however it's a strange place to see an > example mentioned. It could have gone in the rationale, but then again it might be worth explaining it in the beginning. But be aware this is just the proposal, t's a form used in the process. This is not the resulting text, these are in the draft documents listed in the heading. Marco (as the proposer)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]