[ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
gvandeve at cisco.com
Wed Jan 26 11:38:01 CET 2011
> <> > As an example, one would create <provider-tla>::/36 with an assignment > size of /56. A simple MRTG graph over time showing the actual number of > assignments or customers can then be generated from the OSS/BSS system > or maybe even directly from the DHCPv6 servers involved. This would then > satisfy the need to verify the addresses are used efficiently enough and > the LIR meets the HD ratio required. It does so in a way to which most > LIRs are already familiar and without the need to disclose to any > specific information on individual End Users or the resource they hold. > <> > > GV> Not sure why this is here in the intro... it's a valid and usefull > anticipation, but I would place it somewhere else in the document as a > motivation example. Forgive me for asking, are you commenting on the policy proposal itself or on one of the draft documents which will be the result of this ? GV> I was just surprised to see an example in the intro section... it is not that I disagree with it, however it's a strange place to see an example mentioned.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: 2010-06 is going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]