[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Schneider/calispera.com michael.schneider at calispera.com
Mon Nov 8 19:51:09 CET 2010

Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote on 08.11.2010 19:02:29:
> On 8.11.10 11:31, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> > does not make sense to me.
> >
> > 6PE and 6VPE are two ways to run IPv6 over MPLS network, but are not 
the only
> > ones. Therefore, it can not be mandatory.

> What do you suggest? Re-wording, add additional mechanisms or move it to
> optional section?
> Basically it is written "If requested by tender initiator...", that 
makes it as
> a choice...

Hi,

LDPv6 was a dream, but only in draft status [1] this time.
So i don`t know where is a right place for it.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-mpls-ldp-ipv6-04 

Regards Michael

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]