[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Nov 8 19:02:29 CET 2010
On 8.11.10 11:31, Marc Blanchet wrote: > does not make sense to me. > > 6PE and 6VPE are two ways to run IPv6 over MPLS network, but are not the only > ones. Therefore, it can not be mandatory. Marc, hi :) Did not know you are on this list :) :) What do you suggest? Re-wording, add additional mechanisms or move it to optional section? Basically it is written "If requested by tender initiator...", that makes it as a choice... /jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]