[ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralph Smit
ralph.smit at rasm.nl
Sun Feb 7 21:08:09 CET 2010
Marco Hogewoning wrote: > On 3 feb 2010, at 23:44, David Kessens wrote: > >> Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you >> whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you >> have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one >> co-chair is enough. > > > Hi All, > > I had a short chat with Shane this afternoon and we would like you to > know we as candidated would prefer the option to appoint two co-chairs. > Shane and I have known eachother for quite some time and our goals and > objectives for the future of the IPv6 working group are the same, we > both are looking forward working with David and the community to live up > to the new charter en make IPv6 a succes. > > Thanks for all the support so far, > > MarcoH and Shane > > > I support both candidates and agree with many who replied before me (and the candidates themselves) that 2 co-chairs would be a good idea. Regards, Ralph Smit.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]