[ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208

OK +1 for me


Lionel HOFFMANN

Direction Technique
Tel:     01 39 45 42 76
Mob:   06 60 31 42 76
Email:  lhoffman at bouyguestelecom.fr
Adresse: Centre d'affaires La Boursidiere
              RN186  92355 LE PLESSIS ROBINSON cedex

-----Message d'origine-----
De : ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin at ripe.net] De la part de David Kessens
Envoyé : mercredi 3 février 2010 23:44
À : ipv6-wg at ripe.net
Objet : [ipv6-wg] Discussion period for co-chair selection until 20100208


All,

The call for candidates for co-chairs of the IPv6 working group has resulted in two candidates. See below for their names and a link to the mailing list with their motivations and plans for the working group:

Shane Kerr
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00038.html

Marco Hogewoning
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/ipv6-wg/2010/msg00041.html

This brings us to the next step in our process:

  1) The nominees are given a chance to determine whether they want to
     be considered or withdraw as they decided that there are other
     good candidates already available

  2) The community may express opinions that could help the
     candidates to come to a decision on whether they want to
     be continued to be considered as a candidate
     - the community may consider appointing more than one co-chair
       in case of several good candidates

Let's take until the end of Mon Feb 8, 2010 in a timezone of your choice to determine an outcome for both 1) and 2).

I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both candidates as co-chairs.

Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a position yet on this topic.

Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one co-chair is enough.

Note that this period is for open discussion and that it is perfectly fine to do alternate proposals.

Our objective is to see if we can come to a consensus which allows us to avoid more complex ways of making a selection such as a vote.

After our discussion period is over, I will determine if there is enough basis to do a Last Call to confirm a selection decision as determined from our discussion phase, or whether we perhaps need a bit more time for discussion or that we will have to resort to organizing a vote.

I hope this helps,

David Kessens
---



L'intégrité de ce message n'étant pas assurée sur internet, la société expéditrice ne peut être tenue responsable de son contenu ni de ses pièces jointes. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire et d'avertir l'expéditeur.

The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. The company that sent this message cannot therefore be held liable for its content nor attachments. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the sender.