[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Johan Helsingius julf at julf.com
Mon Apr 10 14:31:34 CEST 2017

On 10-04-17 14:28, Marco Hogewoning wrote:

> For many, if not all, providers the current mitigation to abuse (and non-payment) is a full disconnect of the service.

Yes, and that works both ways too. Do I really want my house
thermostat to stop working because my ISP doesn't like me
running a tor node, and do I really want to lose my whole
Internet connectivity because someone hacked my toaster?

	Julf

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
• Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]