[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at ripe.net
Mon Apr 10 14:28:37 CEST 2017
> On 10 Apr 2017, at 14:11, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote: > > As a more Internet related example, many ISPs by default block outbound mail connections to other than their own outgoing mail servers. I also know a number who still have basic filters on SQL ports to curtail things like slammer or direct connections to poorly maintained databases. > > Could or would you extend this to the broader landscape of IoT? I just thought about you can also take the inverse…. For many, if not all, providers the current mitigation to abuse (and non-payment) is a full disconnect of the service. With more and more dependencies on connectivity for a range of (critical) functions in and around the house, is that model sustainable or does it need a different, more selective, approach? Marco
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]