<<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
RE: The Cidr Report
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 16:38:29 -0800
> Interestingly enough what Covad appears to be saying is: > > If we had a way to announce two things > > 1 - here are the advertisements for covering aggregates for Covad > > AND > > 2 - do not believe any more specifics for these address blocks, as they are > NOT part of Covad's routing policy for these prefixes > > then we would not be seeing this unfortunate case of unauthorized route > leakage being resolved in a way that seems to have unfortunate bgp > implications in terms of more specifics appearing. > > So its an interesting question. How could Covad achieve a routing policy > announcement of the form as stated in 2 above? register the covering prefixes in the irr and folk should filter. folk who don't filter are welcome to the results. i encourage my competitors not to filter. randy
- Post To The List:
- References:
- RE: The Cidr Report
- From: Roldan, Brad
- RE: The Cidr Report
- From: Geoff Huston
- RE: The Cidr Report
<<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |