Re: ENUM domain names in Poland.
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:15:00 +0200 (MET DST)
- Virusprotection: checked - Found to be clean
> I guess they still use RFC 2916 format.
yes, we are still using 2916 format for NAPTR RRs
> My *personal* recommendation is to use both 2916 and 2916bis format for
> a while as software might not be updated yet according to 2916bis.
i think it's good idea to support both 2916/2916bis for a while. for example
our "look-up" & "phone book" applications are still based on rfc2916:
> On Mar 31, 2004, at 01:29, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
> > Hi Andrzej,
> > looking at the first number (+48225231300) , I note that the ENUM data
> > is broken.
> > The service field is "mailto+E2U" - in RFC2916bis the E2U goes at the
> > start of
> > the field, NOT the end.
> > Likewise for the second number.
> > Sigh.
> > See ETSI's TS 102 172 for the ETSI spec on Interoperability of
> > European trials.
> > all the best,
> > Lawrence
> > ----
> > On 29 Mar 2004, Andrzej Bartosiewicz wrote:
> > We are using this domain names for testing in Poland.
> > Please, do not call me and my friends in the middle of the night... ;)
> > Andrzej.
> > 0.0.3.1.220.127.116.11.2.8.4.e164.arpa
> > 0.2.9.7.18.104.22.168.6.8.4.e164.arpa
> > <snip>