[dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Call For Presentations RIPE 70, submission deadline 1 March 2015

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Sun Jan 11 23:31:32 CET 2015

On 11/01/2015 19:51, Jim Reid wrote:
> "every calendar year" is even simpler and fewer words than that Nick. :-)

depends what you're looking for.  If it's the simplest and fewest words,
then you will probably want:

[2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years.

The main thing is that the wording should not be ambiguous.

If you're going to go ahead with the other version, a decision needs to be
made about how to decide who gets to resign. Again, the mechanism should be
non-ambiguous. Drawing lots is one mechanism, but there are many others.

Nick

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Call For Presentations RIPE 70, submission deadline 1 March 2015

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]