[dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:20:07 +0100 Peter wrote:
PK> [...] To that extent, the limits are superfluous
PK> because common sense will prevail.
PK> Should they be deemed necessary, there are probably bigger fish to fry,
PK> e.g., the impeachment clause.  

I agree. It seems silly to limit the term of someone willing to serve and
who has wg support.

If, however, the consensus is in favor of term limits, I suggest that
language be added to allow for an exception in the case where there are no
other candidates available with sufficient wg support.


Robert

-- 
Senior Software Engineer @ Parsons
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20150107/f6268571/attachment.sig>