[dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

Jim, all,

On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:33:48PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote:

> One sticking point appears to be the "A co-chair cannot serve more than 2 consecutive terms." provision in [2]. Someone commented at the mike at RIPE69 that this was a good thing. One of your co-chairs says the opposite. Everyone else has not commented one way or the other. Result: stalemate.

I didn't quite say it that way and definitely not ex officio.

What I tried was hold you/the proposal to its design criteria,
first and foremost being "minimalist" or lean or lightweight,
in the spirit of good protocol design - it's ready when yoy can't delete
anything further.  To that extent, the limits are superfluous
because common sense will prevail.
Should they be deemed necessary, there are probably bigger fish to fry,
e.g., the impeachment clause.  

-Peter