[dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ololocc at entratek.com
ololocc at entratek.com
Thu Dec 2 05:53:44 CET 2010
Moderator, Please kindly unsubscribe my email from the group list. Thank you. Cc_ololo at yahoo.com C. C. Ololo Principal Entratek Systems LLC 9319 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX 75243 USA -----Original Message----- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie> Sender: dns-wg-admin at ripe.net Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:38:54 To: <dns-wg at ripe.net> Cc: <cet1 at cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs On 01/12/10 20:27, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > What I fail to see at 1st glance is where the RIR and the PDP comes in? Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs. It's a truly nifty idea, IMNSHO. My employer's LIR has found no objection to this approach. Neither has the tunnel broker for my domestic IPv6 connectivity. For example: dig -x 2001:770:13f:1:: dig -x 2001:770:98:200::35:1 Unfortunately, I didn't have the DNAME option whenever I had to set up reverse DNS for a /19 and a /20 in IPv4 as 48 /24's. Now, since this isn't broken, I'm not minded to fix it. /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]