[dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

Moderator,

Please kindly unsubscribe my email from the group list. Thank you.

Cc_ololo at yahoo.com
C. C. Ololo
Principal
Entratek Systems LLC
9319 LBJ Freeway, 
Dallas, TX 75243 
USA

-----Original Message-----
From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie>
Sender: dns-wg-admin at ripe.net
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:38:54 
To: <dns-wg at ripe.net>
Cc: <cet1 at cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

On 01/12/10 20:27, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> What I fail to see at 1st glance is where the RIR and the PDP comes in?

	Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting
	sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs.

	It's a truly nifty idea, IMNSHO.

	My employer's LIR has found no objection to this approach.
	Neither has the tunnel broker for my domestic IPv6 connectivity.
	For example:

dig -x 2001:770:13f:1::
dig -x 2001:770:98:200::35:1

	Unfortunately, I didn't have the DNAME option whenever I had
	to set up reverse DNS for a /19 and a /20 in IPv4 as 48 /24's.
	Now, since this isn't broken, I'm not minded to fix it.

	/Niall