[dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Wed Dec 1 23:38:54 CET 2010

On 01/12/10 20:27, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> What I fail to see at 1st glance is where the RIR and the PDP comes in?

	Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting
	sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs.

	It's a truly nifty idea, IMNSHO.

	My employer's LIR has found no objection to this approach.
	Neither has the tunnel broker for my domestic IPv6 connectivity.
	For example:

dig -x 2001:770:13f:1::
dig -x 2001:770:98:200::35:1

	Unfortunately, I didn't have the DNAME option whenever I had
	to set up reverse DNS for a /19 and a /20 in IPv4 as 48 /24's.
	Now, since this isn't broken, I'm not minded to fix it.

	/Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]