[dns-wg] Solving lameness in the reverse zones

> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 17:22 -0500, Michael Graff wrote:
> > Are lame delegations really such a problem that we need to take drastic
> > action?  How often would this be checked, and how much liability would
> > be here in modifying what is published?  I'd hate to see the papers when
> > a large content provider lost due to a temporary outage on one name
> > server...

On 23.10.09 12:11, Shane Kerr wrote:
> This approach is based on the assumption that lameness is in itself a
> problem, and must be fixed.
> 
> Also note that we are talking about the reverse DNS in this case, so
> nobody is going to lose revenue if we a delegation is removed.

well, there are still servers and services requiring reverse resolution...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
REALITY.SYS corrupted. Press any key to reboot Universe.