[dns-wg] Solving lameness in the reverse zones
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Solving lameness in the reverse zones
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Solving lameness in the reverse zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Fri Oct 23 12:11:56 CEST 2009
Michael, On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 17:22 -0500, Michael Graff wrote: > Are lame delegations really such a problem that we need to take drastic > action? How often would this be checked, and how much liability would > be here in modifying what is published? I'd hate to see the papers when > a large content provider lost due to a temporary outage on one name > server... This approach is based on the assumption that lameness is in itself a problem, and must be fixed. Also note that we are talking about the reverse DNS in this case, so nobody is going to lose revenue if we a delegation is removed. -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Solving lameness in the reverse zones
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Solving lameness in the reverse zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]