DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
- Previous message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
- Next message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antonio_Blasco Bonito
bonito at nis.garr.it
Tue Nov 7 17:38:16 CET 1995
> > > > Antonio_Blasco Bonito <bonito at nis.garr.it> writes: > > > > I see this matter similar to the EOF. RIPE is the natural reference. > > If the RIPE-NCC needs the approval of the NCC contributors to host > > a ETLDF repository, that could be asked. But I would leave this issue > > to be discussed on the list and at the next RIPE meeting. > > It is not clear to me what the difference is between "ETLDF" and the > DNS-WG is. Further the request was for a closed repository. These are > both different from EOF. EOF is a normal RIPE working group governed by > the RIPE Terms of Reference and any of their material stored at the NCC > is publicly available. > > In other words: If the RIPE-DNS WG asks for an open repository there is > no problem and we will do it immediately. If a closed subgroup asks for > a closed repository this needs consultation with the RIPE chair, the WG > chair and possibly the contributors. > > Please understand that I take this slightly more formally than usual > because it is a matter of principle that all activities of RIPE and RIPE > working groups are open. > > Daniel I fully understand your position. It is clear that the issue needs further discussion in the RIPE-DNS WG and in a closed group if such one is formed, which is not yet the case. Blasco
- Previous message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
- Next message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]