DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
- Previous message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
- Next message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Nov 7 17:14:22 CET 1995
> Antonio_Blasco Bonito <bonito at nis.garr.it> writes: > > I see this matter similar to the EOF. RIPE is the natural reference. > If the RIPE-NCC needs the approval of the NCC contributors to host > a ETLDF repository, that could be asked. But I would leave this issue > to be discussed on the list and at the next RIPE meeting. It is not clear to me what the difference is between "ETLDF" and the DNS-WG is. Further the request was for a closed repository. These are both different from EOF. EOF is a normal RIPE working group governed by the RIPE Terms of Reference and any of their material stored at the NCC is publicly available. In other words: If the RIPE-DNS WG asks for an open repository there is no problem and we will do it immediately. If a closed subgroup asks for a closed repository this needs consultation with the RIPE chair, the WG chair and possibly the contributors. Please understand that I take this slightly more formally than usual because it is a matter of principle that all activities of RIPE and RIPE working groups are open. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
- Next message (by thread): DNS Top Level Domain Questionnaire
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]