[diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Thu Oct 3 18:30:23 CEST 2019
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mirjam Kuehne <mir at ripe.net> > Sent: Thursday 3 October 2019 16:57 > To: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie>; Amanda Gowland > <agowland at ripe.net>; diversity at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the > RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0 > > Hi Brian, > > On 03/10/2019 17:37, Brian Nisbet wrote: > > Amanda, > > > > Thanks for this. > > > > I thought we did have a chair, and I thought that was Mirjam, but I > acknowledge it's been a while since this was talked about. > > Yes, I remember I chaired a meeting where it was decided not to have a chair > :-) But for practical reasons and as a contact person for the RIPE Chair it might > be good to choose a task force chair and best someone from the community > and not the RIPE NCC. I suspect it would. Of course the big question is "who"? For a variety of reasons I don't find myself in a position to chair the TF, nor do I feel I would be the right person to do so. > > > > However we had also tried to have as little... authority as possible, of > course. > > > > That said, should we be sending the May document or the more recent > one to the NCC? And, unfortunately, of course, this means that we won't > have anything to formally propose at RIPE 79, I suppose? > > There is currently a speaking slot for the (chair of the) diversity task force > during the community plenary on Thursday afternoon that could be used to > present the main principles and changes in the document to the community > (Hans Petter is going to contact the task force about this). > But yes, it is probably not ready to come to a final decision at RIPE 79. Right, that would make sense. I am happy to work on such a presentation with people, but again we need different (and more diverse) faces on stage. Thanks, Brian > > I will admit that this is quite late in the day for the NCC legal team to be > asking for this. They had sight of the document in May and that would have > been the time to start talking about an IA, not less than two weeks before a > meeting. Do we know why this suddenly cropped up? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian > > > > Brian Nisbet > > Service Operations Manager > > HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network 1st > > Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland > > +35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie www.heanet.ie > > Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: diversity <diversity-bounces at ripe.net> On Behalf Of Amanda > >> Gowland > >> Sent: Thursday 3 October 2019 13:16 > >> To: diversity at ripe.net > >> Subject: [diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from > >> the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0 > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> So, an update... > >> > >> After speaking with RIPE NCC's legal team on next steps for the CoC, > >> they advise that the Chair of this TF (which we don't have afaik) > >> request an impact analysis and legal review of the RIPE CoC 2.0, > >> which Brian shared on the ripe- list last May for comment: > >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/ripe-meetings/ripe-meeting- > >> code-of-conduct-2-0-draft > >> > >> Could someone (Brian, Shane or Denesh) email legal at ripe.net with the > >> link above to request this and cc the TF? > >> > >> Now, prior to this info, I had been working (a lot) on adapting the > >> 2.0 text to address the comments received here. I also felt that > >> there was a lot of overlap between the CoC text and the CoC Team doc, > >> so I merged them for > >> clarity: > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yqOUPR02SONuSt812cuOBkk_xnhjY > >> zjdk9qmsJkcDdQ/edit > >> > >> This is a version I'd like you to comment on, hopefully we can move > >> forward...I hope we've addressed the concerns about appeals. > >> > >> Happy for your feedback. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Amanda > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> diversity mailing list > >> diversity at ripe.net > >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity > > > > _______________________________________________ > > diversity mailing list > > diversity at ripe.net > > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity > >
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]