[db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Fri Sep 21 19:13:35 CEST 2018
Hello, My point was with the maintainer pair creation as I don't see a reason to give up personal information in the first place. Kind Regards, Cynthia Revström On 2018-09-21 18:38, Daniel Suchy via db-wg wrote: > Hello, > > On 9/21/18 5:00 PM, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: >> This really made me consider it, and I can't really see a valid reason >> to require person objects to create a maintainer for example. > You can use ROLE object instead of PERSON for maintaner creation (and of > course for every object, where you can reference person object). Person > is *not* required. > > Well, currently is not possible to create role-maintainer pair like > person-maintainer with webuptates, but this isn't hard to implement I > think. But you can easily workaround this by creating person-maintainer > pair, then creating role, update maintainer and deleting (temporary) > person object. > > With regards, > Daniel >
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]