[db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Suchy danny at danysek.cz
Fri Sep 21 18:38:24 CEST 2018

Hello,

On 9/21/18 5:00 PM, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote:
> This really made me consider it, and I can't really see a valid reason
> to require person objects to create a maintainer for example.

You can use ROLE object instead of PERSON for maintaner creation (and of
course for every object, where you can reference person object). Person
is *not* required.

Well, currently is not possible to create role-maintainer pair like
person-maintainer with webuptates, but this isn't hard to implement I
think. But you can easily workaround this by creating person-maintainer
pair, then creating role, update maintainer and deleting (temporary)
person object.

With regards,
Daniel

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] PERSON objects in the RIPE Database

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]