[db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Randy Bush randy at psg.com
Thu Jan 26 20:11:44 CET 2017

>> seems to me that this strong identity binding is a feature, not a bug.
> 
> So how do you register two different abuse contacts for different
> abuse departments in house responsible for different parts of a network
> block, if abuse-c is hard-tied to the org object, and you can have only one?
> 
> Which nicely emphasizes the problem statement - it needs to be possible
> to define abuse contacts for more-specific inet(6)num: objects without
> introducing extra org objects...

fine with that.  just do not want org being orgorgorgorg.  arin has made
a fun mess that way.

randy

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]