[db-wg] changes to the implementation of "abuse-c:"

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:11:49PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> >     We understand the reasoning for wanting to use two different org
> >     objects. However, we cannot use different org object IDs for the same
> >     enduser in resources assigned by the RIPE NCC and have to be strict
> >     about it.
> 
> seems to me that this strong identity binding is a feature, not a bug.

So how do you register two different abuse contacts for different
abuse departments in house responsible for different parts of a network
block, if abuse-c is hard-tied to the org object, and you can have only one?

Which nicely emphasizes the problem statement - it needs to be possible
to define abuse contacts for more-specific inet(6)num: objects without
introducing extra org objects...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20170126/c6acc4b5/attachment.sig>