[db-wg] Temporary origins
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Jul 2 23:06:59 CEST 2015
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:42:12AM +0200, Alex Band wrote: >> I'm curious to hear from our Community about what they think about >> this mode of operation; simply create the route object on the inetnum >> holder's authorisation alone, inform the ASN holder that it was >> created and only remove the object if they object. > > I support this direction and style of operation. The philosophy that > an inetnum holder can unilaterally grant the right to announce a > prefix to any ASN makes sense to me, probably is more intuitive to > most. folk seem to be gliding over the last clause in alex's paragraph. are you agreeing with it? i think i am inclined to agree, given the use of peval(as-set:) to get the transitive closure of a peer's prefixes. but it makes me wonder about my use of as-set:s. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]