[db-wg] Temporary origins
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Thu Jul 2 16:16:41 CEST 2015
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 11:42:12AM +0200, Alex Band wrote: > Thanks for sharing your experiences George. > > I'm curious to hear from our Community about what they think about > this mode of operation; simply create the route object on the inetnum > holder's authorisation alone, inform the ASN holder that it was > created and only remove the object if they object. > > It would simplify the authorisation model tremendously and save a lot > of frustration and customer support tickets. > > Seeing that APNIC has positive experiences, would our Community > support such an approach considering the up and downsides? I support this direction and style of operation. The philosophy that an inetnum holder can unilaterally grant the right to announce a prefix to any ASN makes sense to me, probably is more intuitive to most. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Temporary origins
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]