[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Havard Eidnes
he at uninett.no
Wed Oct 12 12:06:53 CEST 2005
> > We have changed the behaviour of the database so that when > > you do a "-c" lookup, we return the IRT object in the > > reply. I thought this was the desired behaviour. You can see > > it here: > > This is useful, but the desired behavious was to always return > the relevant irt record for inetnum queries, along with the > most specific inetnum object. I guess the missing phrase both in the action point and in the above reply is "by default". (And, yes, I agree, that is needed for this action point to make any sense.) Regards, - Håvard
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]