[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Wed Oct 12 11:51:26 CEST 2005
On Oct 12, Shane Kerr <shane at ripe.net> wrote: > We have changed the behaviour of the database so that when you do a "-c" > lookup, we return the IRT object in the reply. I thought this was the > desired behaviour. You can see it here: This is useful, but the desired behavious was to always return the relevant irt record for inetnum queries, along with the most specific inetnum object. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20051012/49a179d3/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
- Next message (by thread): [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]