[db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for object ordering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Engin Gunduz
engin at ripe.net
Wed Feb 23 10:02:28 CET 2005
On 2005-02-23 08:52:07 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > >There is currently a "trouble:" attribute in ROLE objects, which > >contains free text. We will update ROLE objects, so that any ROLE > >object that has a "trouble:" attribute that is an e-mail address as > >defined in RFC 2822, will be copied to the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute. > >Any other "trouble:" attributes will be converted to "remarks:". > > Last week I asked the following and haven't heard any comments about it: > > !Then shouldn't the 'trouble:' attribute be marked as deprecated? > > Perhaps I wasn't clear. If the proposal is to change all current trouble > attributes to either remarks or abuse-mailbox, then in the future, if we > don't deprecate the trouble attribute, anyone can add a new role object > with a trouble attribute, and it *won't* be converted. > > So shouldn't trouble be deprecated? I agree it should be deprecated. It is free-text and its semantics is not very clear, which makes it not very different than "remarks:" attribute. -engin > > -Hank -- Engin Gunduz RIPE NCC Software Engineering Department
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for object ordering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]