[db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at mail.iucc.ac.il
Wed Feb 23 07:52:07 CET 2005
>There is currently a "trouble:" attribute in ROLE objects, which >contains free text. We will update ROLE objects, so that any ROLE >object that has a "trouble:" attribute that is an e-mail address as >defined in RFC 2822, will be copied to the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute. >Any other "trouble:" attributes will be converted to "remarks:". Last week I asked the following and haven't heard any comments about it: !Then shouldn't the 'trouble:' attribute be marked as deprecated? Perhaps I wasn't clear. If the proposal is to change all current trouble attributes to either remarks or abuse-mailbox, then in the future, if we don't deprecate the trouble attribute, anyone can add a new role object with a trouble attribute, and it *won't* be converted. So shouldn't trouble be deprecated? -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]