[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon Apr 12 12:25:27 CEST 2004
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 11:57:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Apr 12, MarcoH <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote: > > > So what's the chance people will actually introduce enough IRT objects to > > make it usefull to look for them and at the same time enough toolwriters > > with some decent knowledge about the database to find the correct e-mail > > attribute ? > I'd say it will be much higher than for abuse-mailbox given that it does > not require to update each and every inetnum object. To quote the original proposal: == The objects addressed by this proposal (inetnum:, inet6num:, person:, role:, mntner:) would be extended by the addition to their templates of a new attribute definition, as follows. abuse-mailbox: [optional] [multiple] [inverse key] The value of the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute must be a valid and active RFC-2822 address. == Where does this gives the need to update each and every object in the database ? Next to that, 10% of the inetnum objects contain the less maintainable remarks workaround. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]