[db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Thu Apr 8 11:23:30 CEST 2004
On Apr 08, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> wrote: > And what reasons are there to assume that the new proposal will > be deployed all of a sudden? I think it should be obvious that abuse-c and abuse-mailbox attributes are much harder to deploy, because they require modifying every bottom level inetnum/inetnum6 object (which may even be protected by the mntner object of the customer). I still think that the requirements for handling of abuse contacts have not been discussed enough. -- ciao, | Marco | [5613 diD/o8PEXAukY] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040408/01621315/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]