[cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Wed Feb 22 21:57:34 CET 2017
In message <4C47D72B-8A25-4CFE-AF61-B7347F726579 at ripe.net>, at 12:32:33 on Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Chris Buckridge <chrisb at ripe.net> writes >LEA interest in reducing the use of CGN also came up for discussion at >the recent RIPE NCC Roundtable Meeting for Governments and Regulators >(held in Brussels on 24 January) The UK's approach, as expressed in the 2016 IP[1] Act, is not to prohibit CGN, but require operators to log who was using which IP, when. This is exactly the same as when Internet access was primarily by dial-up to banks of modems, and customers shared the IP Address of the modem. The ISPs were expected to log who had been online at a specific IP address at a specific time. [1] Investigatory Powers, not Internet Protocol. -- Roland Perry
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]