[cooperation-wg] Europol Communication on Carrier-Grade NAT

Chris

100% agree with Gordon on this.

Transparency => trust

And while I appreciate that the NCC isn’t trying to obfuscate anything,  sharing information as widely as possible to members is helpful and appreciated 

Regards 

Michele


--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://blacknight.blog /
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

On 16/02/2017, 14:22, "cooperation-wg on behalf of Gordon Lennox" <cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net on behalf of gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote:

    It is funny how things progress. Not that long ago we had various LEAs complaining about IPv6. Google << IPv6 FBI >> for examples, including this:
    
    "The FBI, DEA, and Royal Canadian Mounted Police say IPv6 may erode their ability to trace Internet addresses -- and warn new laws may be necessary if industry doesn't do more."
    
    https://www.cnet.com/news/fbi-dea-warn-ipv6-could-shield-criminals-from-police/
    
    Anyway while I think outreach and "enhanced cooperation”  by NCC can be a good thing I also think that transparency is important to maintain the trust of the community. I believe more reporting of the detail of meetings and contacts between NCC and LEAs and regulators would be helpful.
    
    For starters, I might ask if there will be reports on the recent Round Table in Brussels and on NCC’s involvement with the European Parliament’s EIF? (Sorry Chris!)
    
    Gordon