[cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Apr 8 17:18:50 CEST 2014
On 8 Apr 2014, at 15:17, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote: > On the bright side it could make implementing carrier-grade NATs so much more fun. Or perhaps it'll be the tipping point for carriers to deploy IPv6. :-) Says he both ducking for cover and running away...
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]