[cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gordon Lennox
gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 8 16:17:15 CEST 2014
On 8 Apr, 2014, at 14:28, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote: > that information MUST be deleted when it is not needed anymore Or maybe more: personal information should be deleted or anonymised when it is no longer required for the specific purpose the individual originally agreed too. So no long-term archiving and no re-use for non-related purposes. But yes. This will be messy. Even post-Snoden. And even if we see stories like this: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-26936116 On the bright side it could make implementing carrier-grade NATs so much more fun. Gordon See also: http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/incision/european-court-rules-mass-surveillance-of-communications-unlawful/
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Data Retention Directive considered harmful
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]