[cooperation-wg] European Parliament

Thx a lot for valuable info all of you!

/Maria
chair Cooperation WG


_________________________________
Best regards, 

Maria Häll
CEO/Föreståndare SUNET - Swedish University Network
Email: maria at sunet.se
Mobile: +46 70 535 41 38
Web: www.sunet.se

20 okt 2013 kl. 16:36 skrev Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk>:

> Just to make sure that everyone is clear on the division of responsibilities:  
> 
> * ITRE has SOLE competence on:
>  o   Article 1 (3)  - reference to the electronic communications Directive
>  o   Article 3.1(a) - as above
>  o   Article 7 - CERTS
>  o   Recitals 5, 11, 23 - which covered the above issues
> *ITRE has SHARED competence with IMCO on:
>  o   Article 1(2) (Subject matter and scope);
>  o   Article 3(1)(b-c); Article 3(2-4), (6-7), (11) (Definitions);
>  o   Article 8 (Cooperation network);
>  o   Article 9 (Secure information-sharing system);
>  o   Article 10 (Early warnings);
>  o   Article 11 (Coordinated response);
>  o   Article 12 (Union NIS cooperation plan);
>  o   Article 14 (Security requirements and incident notification);
>  o   Article 15 (Implementation and enforcement);
>  o   Article 18 (Exercise of the delegation);
>  o   Article 19 (Committee procedure);
>  o   Recitals 12-20, 22, 24-31, 34-36.
> 
> In the case of shared competence, it is possible that IMCO and ITRE will coordinate and try to reach common opinions.  If not, ITRE can re-table its amendments when the discussion goes into plenary.
> 
> There are two other committees with competence:  LIBE and SEDE.  If I understand correctly, these are exclusive competence, so their input should be accepted directly by IMCO.  However, some of this is disturbing (liability of software producers, for example).
> 
> Best
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Wim Degezelle
> Sent: 17 October 2013 23:34
> To: 'Bastiaan Goslings'; 'Gordon Lennox'
> Cc: cooperation-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
> 
> Hi All,
> The leading Committee in EP on the NIS Directive is IMCO (Internal Market) with Andreas Schwab as Rapporteur. Where there is a so-called 'shared competence' the ITRE Committee and LIBE Committee take the lead.
> 
> Procedure file:
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&refere
> nce=COM%282013%290048 
> 
> Best,
> Wim
> CENTR
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg- 
>> bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Bastiaan Goslings
>> Sent: donderdag 17 oktober 2013 16:33
>> To: Gordon Lennox
>> Cc: Bastiaan Goslings; cooperation-wg at ripe.net
>> Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
>> 
>> On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Gordon Lennox 
>> <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The European Internet Foundation includes a group of MEPs who have a
>> clear interest in Internet matters.
>>> 
>>> https://www.eifonline.org/members.html
>>> 
>>> There are others of course!
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks, Gordon - btw do you know which EU parliamentarian 'committee'
>> was being referred to during the Coop session today in Athens?
>> Supposedly this would give one an indication which national MEP(s) to 
>> approach re the proposed NIS Directive...
>> 
>> Btw I have been talking to the Dutch representative in the Council's 
>> working group (hope that is the correct English translation) and 
>> learnt that from her perspective nothing has really changed or been 
>> done since the initial position/reflection re the proposed Directive 
>> went to the Dutch Parliament in in March...
>> 
>> (a position btw that states similar concerns as the ones that RIPE NCC
>> mentioned)
>> 
>> Bastiaan
>> AMS-IX
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131021/81f80468/attachment.html>