[cooperation-wg] European Parliament
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Boyle
Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk
Sun Oct 20 16:36:48 CEST 2013
Just to make sure that everyone is clear on the division of responsibilities: * ITRE has SOLE competence on: o Article 1 (3) - reference to the electronic communications Directive o Article 3.1(a) - as above o Article 7 - CERTS o Recitals 5, 11, 23 - which covered the above issues *ITRE has SHARED competence with IMCO on: o Article 1(2) (Subject matter and scope); o Article 3(1)(b-c); Article 3(2-4), (6-7), (11) (Definitions); o Article 8 (Cooperation network); o Article 9 (Secure information-sharing system); o Article 10 (Early warnings); o Article 11 (Coordinated response); o Article 12 (Union NIS cooperation plan); o Article 14 (Security requirements and incident notification); o Article 15 (Implementation and enforcement); o Article 18 (Exercise of the delegation); o Article 19 (Committee procedure); o Recitals 12-20, 22, 24-31, 34-36. In the case of shared competence, it is possible that IMCO and ITRE will coordinate and try to reach common opinions. If not, ITRE can re-table its amendments when the discussion goes into plenary. There are two other committees with competence: LIBE and SEDE. If I understand correctly, these are exclusive competence, so their input should be accepted directly by IMCO. However, some of this is disturbing (liability of software producers, for example). Best Martin -----Original Message----- From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Wim Degezelle Sent: 17 October 2013 23:34 To: 'Bastiaan Goslings'; 'Gordon Lennox' Cc: cooperation-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament Hi All, The leading Committee in EP on the NIS Directive is IMCO (Internal Market) with Andreas Schwab as Rapporteur. Where there is a so-called 'shared competence' the ITRE Committee and LIBE Committee take the lead. Procedure file: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&refere nce=COM%282013%290048 Best, Wim CENTR > -----Original Message----- > From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Bastiaan Goslings > Sent: donderdag 17 oktober 2013 16:33 > To: Gordon Lennox > Cc: Bastiaan Goslings; cooperation-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Gordon Lennox > <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The European Internet Foundation includes a group of MEPs who have a > clear interest in Internet matters. > > > > https://www.eifonline.org/members.html > > > > There are others of course! > > > Thanks, Gordon - btw do you know which EU parliamentarian 'committee' > was being referred to during the Coop session today in Athens? > Supposedly this would give one an indication which national MEP(s) to > approach re the proposed NIS Directive... > > Btw I have been talking to the Dutch representative in the Council's > working group (hope that is the correct English translation) and > learnt that from her perspective nothing has really changed or been > done since the initial position/reflection re the proposed Directive > went to the Dutch Parliament in in March... > > (a position btw that states similar concerns as the ones that RIPE NCC > mentioned) > > Bastiaan > AMS-IX > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]