[cooperation-wg] Internet governance
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Meredith Whittaker
meredithrachel at google.com
Thu Nov 21 18:05:53 CET 2013
at the risk of derailing the thread, what *does* anticensorship taste like? (stated more plainly: I don't follow.) On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Roland Perry < roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote: > In message <528E1E7B.60000 at inex.ie>, at 14:53:47 on Thu, 21 Nov 2013, > Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> writes > > Where is the "running code" when it come to (eg) denying IXPs the right to >>> have provider-independent IPv6 addresses (as was the case for some >>> considerable time). >>> >> >> that particular policy bug was fixed in the summer of 2001. In the 12.5 >> years since then, I think we can reasonably claim that the RIPE community >> has built up a vibrant interest in actively managing its addressing >> policies using bottom up principals. >> > > And I don't dispute that for a moment. > > Currently I'm particularly interested in getting the "underbottom" (that's > users and their representatives, rather than typically the layer above, > their connectivity suppliers) more involved in that process. It's a bit > like "civil society, but without the anticensorship flavour". > -- > Roland Perry > > -- Meredith Whittaker Program Manager, Google Research Google NYC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131121/0bd33812/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]