[cooperation-wg] Internet governance
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Thu Nov 21 17:53:39 CET 2013
In message <528E1E7B.60000 at inex.ie>, at 14:53:47 on Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> writes >> Where is the "running code" when it come to (eg) denying IXPs the right to >> have provider-independent IPv6 addresses (as was the case for some >> considerable time). > >that particular policy bug was fixed in the summer of 2001. In the 12.5 >years since then, I think we can reasonably claim that the RIPE community >has built up a vibrant interest in actively managing its addressing >policies using bottom up principals. And I don't dispute that for a moment. Currently I'm particularly interested in getting the "underbottom" (that's users and their representatives, rather than typically the layer above, their connectivity suppliers) more involved in that process. It's a bit like "civil society, but without the anticensorship flavour". -- Roland Perry
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] Internet governance
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]