[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?

On 17 aug 2012, at 13:55, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:

> On 17 Aug 2012, at 12:52, Paul Rendek wrote:
> 
>> I hope this provides some useful information, and am happy to answer any further questions you may have on this list.
> 
> It does Paul: very helpful. Thanks very much.
> 
> Hopefully there will be some time in the WG agenda at RIPE65 to discuss ITR matters and how best to respond to these.

Yes, we chairs did talk about this with Paul and Chris, and our conclusion/plan for WCIT is the following (comments welcome of course):

1. There will be a session in the plenary on the Tuesday on WCIT. All details not finished for it. This is due to be not have done all of my home work, so no shadow over the committee that have planned the session.

2. We will have followup questions and deeper discussions during say 40-50% of the coop wg session where we can discuss more with each other on how we can move forward.

So, we hope that as many as possible interested in these WCIT issues can go to _both_. At least enough so that we can connect the two sessions, although one is on Tuesday and the other on Thursday.

   Patrik