[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Aug 17 13:55:06 CEST 2012
On 17 Aug 2012, at 12:52, Paul Rendek wrote: > I hope this provides some useful information, and am happy to answer > any further questions you may have on this list. It does Paul: very helpful. Thanks very much. Hopefully there will be some time in the WG agenda at RIPE65 to discuss ITR matters and how best to respond to these.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]