[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Aug 3 11:18:22 CEST 2012
On 3 Aug 2012, at 09:49, Dmitry Burkov wrote: > But there are more even more dangerous contributions - I recommend > to read full lists of them Hi Dima. For those of us who are too busy or (like me, too lazy) to read them all, could you please point us at the more dangerous ones? The contributions are not organised in a way which makes is easy to browse or search them.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]