[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Burkov
dvburk at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 10:49:33 CEST 2012
contribution 40 from March 2011 is well known and it is a key base for all speculations but nothing was done - even requested wording But there are more even more dangerous contributions - I recommend to read full lists of them On Aug 3, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > http://wcitleaks.org is publishing contributions (ITU-speak for discussion papers, agenda items, etc) which are likely to be discussed at the ITR meeting in December. > > According to http://files.wcitleaks.org/public/Russia%2040.pdf, Russia wants the ITU to effectively become an RIR and allocate IPv6 addresses. See item 8 at the bottom of page 3 of their list of changes to the ITR Articles. Looks like someone's been drinking the Nav6 Kool-Aid. Sigh. > > Will the NCC as a Sector Member, (and the other RIRs?) submit a response to this? Should concerned members of this WG be contacting their governments? > >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]