[Apwg-ipv6-papi] [pdo] policy proposal done?

[Marco Schmidt]

Hello,

On 9/7/13 2:40 PM, Elvis Velea wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I managed to read the whole document and I want to thank Comms for 
> their great work.
>
> @Marco - I'd like to request three small changes, if that is still 
> possible.
>
> 1. please update the e-mail address in the Authors section from 
> elvis at velea.eu to elvis at v4escrow.net
>
No problem.
>
> 2. I would like to add an other short rationale supporting the proposal:
>
> Currently, organisations that want to offer services (other than 
> shared) to their customers over IPv6 can only to this if they become 
> an LIR. Non-LIRs can use IPv6 PI only to number their internal network 
> and offer shared hosted services. This policy allows Non-LIRs to offer 
> all of their services to customers over IPv6 as well.
Sounds reasonable. Are the other proposers fine with that?

>
> (I had my coffee before writing this paragraph but I don't like how 
> it's written, maybe you can reword it and make it shorter and clearer :)
>
I will ask a native English speaker from Comms to have a look and I'll 
send you their approach as soon I get it.

>
> 3. I would split 6.1 in two different sections
>
> 6.1 Allocations for Anycasting TLD and
> 6.2 Allocations for Tier 0/1 ENUM Nameservers
>
> (what do you think? would it be better to split it or just leave it as 
> it is right now?)
As I'm not so involved in the proposal development I don't see yet what 
would be the advantage of this split. But it's your proposal :) What do 
the other proposers think?

>
>
> the rest looks great.

My plan is to publish the proposal on Tuesday. This gives you the chance 
to to agree with the final version or provide last minute changes during 
the whole Monday. And I have enough time with our webmaster to set up 
everything.

Best regards,
Marco

>
> thanks,
> elvis
>
> On 9/5/13 3:44 PM, Daniel Stolpe wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I like the side-by-side layout.
>>
>> I will have another reading and see if something new pops up in the last
>> minute.
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Marco Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Dear proposers,
>>>
>>> please find attached the Comms-edited version of your proposal.
>>>
>>> Please take your time and check if everything is fine with you (title,
>>> summary, rationale and policy text).
>>>
>>> I raised already the ticket with our webmasters to prepare the 
>>> websites, but
>>> we still can implement all possible changes that you might suggest 
>>> until
>>> Monday.
>>>
>>>
>>> For a better overview I plan to present the current and new policy text
>>> beside each other
>>> (similar like for 2013-03
>>> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/other-documents/ipv4-address-allocation-and-assignment-policies-for-the-ripe-ncc-service-region-current) 
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you like this idea or do you maybe have another idea?
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Marco Schmidt
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/2/13 5:49 PM, Elvis Velea wrote:
>>>>   Hi Marco,
>>>>
>>>>   one day extra does not matter that much.
>>>>
>>>>   I still think we can wait until Comms has edited the policy 
>>>> proposal :)
>>>>
>>>>   Please ask them to go ahead and we will review the final document on
>>>>   Thursday evening.
>>>>   If all is ok, we can give the go-ahead for the webmaster to 
>>>> publish it on
>>>>   the website and you can send the official announcement on Monday or
>>>>   Tuesday :)
>>>>
>>>>   thanks for all the great work.
>>>>
>>>>   cheers,
>>>>   elvis
>>>>
>>>>   PS: please ask them to update the e-mail address on the document 
>>>> from
>>>>   elvis at velea.eu to elvis at v4escrow.net.
>>>>
>>>>   On 9/2/13 5:28 PM, Marco Schmidt wrote:
>>>>>   Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>>   please find attached your policy proposal after the error check.
>>>>>
>>>>>   There is a little adjustment with Comms time estimation for the 
>>>>> full
>>>>>   edit - it's now estimated to be done until Thursday noon this 
>>>>> week. I
>>>>>   still expect the announcement will be possible next week Monday, 
>>>>> latest
>>>>>   Tuesday.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Please let me know if you would not like the full edit anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Kind regards,
>>>>>   Marco Schmidt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   On 9/2/13 12:00 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>>>>>>   Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:26:51AM +0200, Elvis Velea wrote:
>>>>>>>   @Gert & Sander, do you think this meets the schedule to have the
>>>>>>>   discussion phase last until the end of October?
>>>>>>   AFAIR, there's only a minimum time for discussion, so when we 
>>>>>> publish
>>>>>>   next week, that would give us 7 weeks -> fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I'll be on vacation then, but Sander and Marco will handle all :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Gert Doering
>>>>>>            -- NetMaster
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Daniel Stolpe
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________________ 
>>
>> Daniel Stolpe           Tel:  08 - 688 11 81 stolpe at resilans.se
>> Resilans AB             Fax:  08 - 55 00 21 63 http://www.resilans.se/
>> Box 13 054                                  556741-1193
>> 103 02 Stockholm
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apwg-ipv6-papi mailing list
>> Apwg-ipv6-papi at ripe.net
>> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/apwg-ipv6-papi
>>
>